On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd rather to the opposite and force the port not to depend on > libinotify, which is less intrusive.
Why? We usually add dependencies instead of removing them. > Also, looking at the PR, it looks like sys/inotify.h was already being > found even without changing CMAKE_REQUIRED_INCLUDES, so only the linking > part seems necessary. It isn't: without it sys/inotify.h is not detected. The user probably had some non-standard configuration. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <[email protected]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
