On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:37:27 +0200 Alberto Villa wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd argue that we only do that when the dependencies are necessary. > > libinotify looks like something that should have been part of the > > kernel, not in a separate library > > Actually, we add all required and optional dependencies (and make them > OPTIONal when they are intrusive, which is not the case of libinotify > - 33 kB and no dependencies), if they are of any use for the port.
Keep in mind that libinotify is not fully compatible with linux implementation. The code in kdepim uses IN_OPEN event, which is not implemented in libinotify yet. btw, kdelibs suffers from the same problem too. Max _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
