Max Brazhnikov <[email protected]> writes: >> It's not entirely clear to me why these ports were split in the first >> place; from area51 r8887, I can only assume it's to avoid adding a lot >> of dependencies to the linguist ports (bug 190929 comes to mind). > > Not to the linguist, but virtually to any Qt based port. libQtUiTools is > a very common dependency,
That's what I thought, but looking at freshports.org the only port that currently depends on qt5-uitools is qt5-linguist, which itself is only depended upon by devel/qt5 and graphics/luminance-qt5. Perhaps the situation in Qt 5 is different from the one in Qt 4? >> If that is indeed the case, we already have qt5-linguist and >> qt5-linguisttools with the latter having the translation tools used >> by most Qt-based ports. We could then make the actual qt5-linguist >> port depend on qt5-designer without many complains (I hope). As for >> qt5-qmldevtools, since the port now depends on qt5-qml to build and >> the header files it used to install are now shipped only by qt5-qml, >> I see little purpose in keeping it around. > > I agree about merging qml ports, I don't see strong reason for keeping them > split. Right, I'll proceed with this part. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
