On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 22:10:50 +0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Max Brazhnikov <[email protected]> writes: > > >> It's not entirely clear to me why these ports were split in the first > >> place; from area51 r8887, I can only assume it's to avoid adding a lot > >> of dependencies to the linguist ports (bug 190929 comes to mind). > > > > Not to the linguist, but virtually to any Qt based port. libQtUiTools is > > a very common dependency, > > That's what I thought, but looking at freshports.org the only port that > currently depends on qt5-uitools is qt5-linguist, which itself is only > depended upon by devel/qt5 and graphics/luminance-qt5. Perhaps the > situation in Qt 5 is different from the one in Qt 4?
There are only nine Qt 5 based ports in the portstree, this number is too low for estimations. As for Qt 4, we have ~1000 ports that depend on qt4-gui, and ~250 of them depend on qt4-designer, while only ~10 of them provide plugins for Designer. Only these latter ports really need qt4-designer, all other ports would be probably satisfied by qt4-uitools. _______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
