Hello, On Wednesday 7 April 2010 20:25:19 Paulo Rômulo wrote: > After reading your messages I have written my early proposal for this idea > and before submit it at the GSoC website, I would listen some feedback from > you. > > You can find it here: http://docs.google.com/View?id=d785g6k_11gpccrpdx
In short: I think that some more work is required for this proposal. And really sorry about this opinion as we're definitely cutting it very short to the deadline so you don't have much time to research on the different topics. Now some more details: - I think you can safely add the data-gathering application to the GSoC proposal itself as I think a couple of points are overestimated. - "InternetGatewayDevice wrapper module" comes directly from Friedrich mail without further details. What do you have in mind there? In fact I think it could simply be one new frontend class in libsolid and would then mostly be part of the Solid UPnP backend work. Once you got the backend rolling it should be fairly trivial. - I think that the Plasma Device Notifier is overestimated in the timeline... - ... while the Network Neighborhood Plasmoid is likely underestimated. - Overall, more details on each of the tasks would be welcome. It'd show that you indeed know what work is required. - For the details regarding solid itself, hunt me down to get details. But apart from those missing details, a mockup for the Network Neighborhood Plasmoid would be very welcome. I'll be around on IRC tomorrow (from 6am to 5pm UTC) if you have more questions about solid itself (and I bet you do have such questions). Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
