On Thursday 8 April 2010 12:12:04 Bart Cerneels wrote: > We should make HUPnP part of the proposal then. But with some > abstraction to allow different backends. Some platforms have native > backends that can not be bypassed because of resource and security > restrictions.
Well, as far as libsolid is concerned obviously no need for such an abstraction. Who would want to abstract the abstraction that libsolid is? ;-) We can have several different UPnP backends in there, some being built or not depending on the platform (to ensure using the native facilities if needed). Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
