On Thursday 05 June 2008, you wrote: > Michael Biebl wrote: > > 6.) License > > COPYING only lists GPL2+ as license, but it seems *.cpp, *.h, dbus/*.h > > examples/* are dual-licensed under GPL2+ and Academic Free License 2.1. > > tools/dbusxml2qt3/* seems to be BSD style licensed. > > tools/dbusxml2qt3/ ist MIT/X11 of course, sorry for the confusion. It > also seems I missed tools/dbusxml2qt3/LICENSE. > > Nonetheless I'd be interested to know, why this combination of different > licenses was chosen.
The Qt4 code this was based on was already dual licenced AFL/GPL by its original author Harald Fernengel, so I just kept this for file I added to the bindings. I chose MIT/X11 for the generator tool for no particular reason other than not wanting any restriction on (re-)use at all. Could also have used 2-clause BSD or something like that. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-networkmanager mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-networkmanager
