Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008, um 02:36 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Aljord: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But now my biggest wish: > > There is no entry on techbase for this project if I searched > > sufficiently. > > There is a page about switching to git using gitorious here: > > http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/GitoriousKDE
Thanks. (Why didn't this showup on the search for git? http://techbase.kde.org/Special:Search?search=git&fulltext=Search) Would it be okay if I setup a product-neutral page about switching to a DVCS (this mailing list is also named kde-scm-interest, not kde-$product-interest)? I would try to start to collect there all information passing this mailing list. > > Or link collections to interesting articles on the topic, like > > experience reports (like: From svn to $DVCS and back ;) > > Google have tons of links if you search for "svn to git", anyway, But which ones are valuable? :) And then I am not so much interested _how_ to do a move to $DVCS , but _why_ ;) > > But how to handle the merge of a branch in another repository with > > perhaps local accounts, not given by the KDE admins? How should copyright > > assignment be handled? BTW, doesn't the same problem already arise with > > subversion today when svnmerge is used, as done e.g. in the merging of > > the PIM enterprise branch, which are commited by one person and have no > > clear authorship (thus copyright ownership) registered with the system, > > IIUC. Is this alright? > > You can digitally sign commits with Git and most DVCS, that can be useful. Can, but is it enforced? Cheers Friedrich -- Okteta - KDE Hex Editor, coming to you with KDE 4.1 _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
