Ian Monroe wrote: >Plus no one, until you here now (maybe?), has been proposing that KDE >consider going away from having a canonical master branch.
Phonon is in kdesupport, so it's not technically part of KDE.
In any case, my proposal would be that the two repositories share more or
less the same things. Both master repositories refer to almost the same
Phonon (minus a few commits here and there that still need to be merged).
But the important difference would not be the master branches, it would be
the stable ones. The KDE repository of Phonon would have the branches that
are released with KDE (4.0, 4.2 and 4.3 today), whereas the QtSW one would
contain the branches that Qt releases with (4.1 and 4.4 in a month).
However, if we introduce Continuous Integration for Phonon in Qt, then we
can't just merge commits from the KDE repo: those commits have to pass
regression testing before being allowed in.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
