Thiago Macieira schrieb: > But the important difference would not be the master branches, it would be > the stable ones. The KDE repository of Phonon would have the branches that > are released with KDE (4.0, 4.2 and 4.3 today), whereas the QtSW one would > contain the branches that Qt releases with (4.1 and 4.4 in a month). > > However, if we introduce Continuous Integration for Phonon in Qt, then we > can't just merge commits from the KDE repo: those commits have to pass > regression testing before being allowed in.
IOW, KDE's Phonon development is ahead of Qt's. Right? That is: - If everything is OK, then Qt's Phonon is a proper subset of KDE's. - But if QtSW finds a regression in the version that it intends to release, then it makes a fixup commit, that KDE would eventually have to merge in. -- Hannes _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
