On July 28, 2009 00:04:54 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >A Dilluns, 27 de juliol de 2009, Chani va escriure: > >> > > I don't expect it to happen often at all, but it'd be nice if it > >> > > didn't take down translations for the whole branch if it does. > >> > > >> > Why it should take them down? If updating fails it will work over > >> > old files but i don't see why it would take down translations at > >> > all. > >> > > >> > I mean, svn has the exact same problem, no? If svn up fails, > >> > findfiles works over old files, right? > >> > >> not with git, because the way I wrote it those "old files" may > >> actually be a different branch. so it aborts to avoid doing weird > >> things. > >> > >> the lazy way out would be to just use some extra disk space and have > >> separate workdirs for separate branches (I've never done that before, > >> though, so thiago would have to explain how it works). > > > >That would be the easy way and that's what we do for svn so disk space > > is not really a problem. > > If disk space is not a problem, just clone again.
ok, so then I'd want the branch, when it does git, to just use a different set of folders... easy peasy :) does anyone actually care what I name them? I'm thinking git-unstable/ and git-stable/ (which would map to trunk and branch). -- This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3. www.chani3.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
