On 12/9/2009 6:48 PM, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 00:36, Oswald Buddenhagen <o...@kde.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:14:17AM +0100, Lydia Pintscher wrote: >>> Once all of KDE is on gitorious it will be extremely hard to maintain >>> the policy of only having these $-developer groups for merge requests >>> and nothing else. And the more of those groups we create with every >>> project that moves the bigger the incentive will be to not use >>> +kde-developers but the smaller group for commit rights. >>> >> why do you bring +kde-developers in? it is *exactly* the equivalent of >> having an svn account. > > Well yes. That is exactly my point. We only want +kde-developers to > commit to "our" code and we want them to have access to all of it, not > only a part. > With a lot of those small project groups we give the opportunity to > give only a small group commit access to a certain part of our code.
I think you're misunderstanding. The purpose of the small project groups is *only* for review capabilities -- i.e. merge requests. So essentially, you join the groups to opt-in to the merge request for that group's repositories (and have the ability to change the status of the merge requests). That's *all*. All repositories will have commit access by, and *only* by +kde-developers. And all repositories will have admin access by, and *only* by, +kde-sysadmin. (Should it be renamed +kde-sysadmins? Dunno.) --Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
