On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 00:57, Jeff Mitchell <mitch...@kde.org> wrote: >> Well yes. That is exactly my point. We only want +kde-developers to >> commit to "our" code and we want them to have access to all of it, not >> only a part. >> With a lot of those small project groups we give the opportunity to >> give only a small group commit access to a certain part of our code. > > I think you're misunderstanding. > > The purpose of the small project groups is *only* for review > capabilities -- i.e. merge requests. So essentially, you join the groups > to opt-in to the merge request for that group's repositories (and have > the ability to change the status of the merge requests). That's *all*. > > All repositories will have commit access by, and *only* by +kde-developers. > > And all repositories will have admin access by, and *only* by, > +kde-sysadmin. (Should it be renamed +kde-sysadmins? Dunno.)
Ok jep. That sounds good and was what I understood. It's more about what those will be used for in the future. Let's rename the group to -reviewers then to make it clearer what it is about and discouraging people from "abusing" it? Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher Amarok community manager kde.org - amarok.kde.org - kubuntu.org claimid.com/nightrose _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
