On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:04:40 +0200 Tom Albers <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Scm-interest, > > As promised, the people behind the sysadmin team would like to give > advice regarding the monolithic vs split repositories issues. We have > tried to stay away from the community/social issues and focus on the > technical consequences such a decision involves - such as how to > setup the different services we will setup. > > Our advise is to use a split repositories approach.
I agree that this makes the most sense, but I wonder how the kdepim module(s) (and others?) should handle this with regards to preserving history in the conversion process. In the kdepim module(s) there has been (and are) a lot of files/subdirs moving between the different applications and libraries. Writing rules for all of these moves so that history is complete for all would be gits would be near impossible. @pim: How should we handle this? @scm: Any advice? > The sysadmin team would like to setup the services real soon now, so > we ask this list to come up with a final decision about the setup. To > be clear: whatever you decide, we will implement it to the best of our > capabilities. Thanks for the work in investigating and documenting this. /Regards Torgny P.s. Please remove the other list if the answer is not for all. D.s. _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
