On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Torgny Nyblom <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:03:39 -0500 > Ian Monroe <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] >> AFAIK, its impossible to have svn2git rules for a monolithic repo like >> KDE Multimedia with submodules like Dragon Player produce complete >> history. So I think we are misunderstanding each other? > > Why? What kind of change cannot svn2git handle?
Dragon Player had a standard story: started in playground, moved to kdereview, moved to kdemultimedia. With monolithic modules, svn2git is not able to save the history from before it moved to kdemultimedia. >> It's likely possible to create a complete history (meaning, a separate >> git commit for every SVN commit) for Dragon Player once its treated as >> a separate repo by svn2git. And therefore Torgny Nyblom's concerns >> about splitting making history-completeness worse are misplaced. > > Why would this be easier? Use these rules in the above context but with > a prefix if necessary. That doesn't work, I've tried and its a known thing. Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
