On Tuesday 07 September 2010 21:38:00 Chani wrote: > On September 7, 2010 11:35:28 Christoph Cullmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 07 September 2010 18:04:40 Tom Albers wrote: > > > The sysadmin team would like to setup the services real soon now, so we > > > ask this list to come up with a final decision about the setup. To be > > > clear: whatever you decide, we will implement it to the best of our > > > capabilities. > > > > I agree on the general direction, the split approach just makes it much > > more easy for people working on individual apps to contribute by avoiding > > to clone everything. > > > > For Kate for example that still would mean to split out the part and > > ktexteditor interfaces from kdelibs, which is already done in the > > gitorious kate repo, which bundles part/app/kwrite and ktexteditor > > interfaces for the part. > > the way I read it, that wasn't part of the sysadmins' proposal; kdelibs was > to be kept intact. I never said it was in their proposal to do so. But if we want to migrate the current kate gitorious repo, that needs to be done that way.
Greetings Christoph _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
