Thanks for this detailed analysis - I also think you choice is the only way to go.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 22:50, Stefan Majewsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 07 September 2010 22:03:28 Chani wrote: >> What I'm concerned about here is plasmoids: even if we go for split >> repositories for apps (which I agree would make for a much easier and less >> surprising kdereview workflow), it may be a bit excessive for every little >> plasmoid to have its own repo. >> Perhaps for little plasmoids (and other odds and ends that will inevitably >> crop up) we could move them and leave/copy their history? > > It might be beneficial to adopt the monolithic approach here at a small scale. I would take the same route - why do it differently when it's more or less the same problem? Niko _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
