On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:48:49 +0200, Ingo Klöcker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Tom Albers wrote: >> Don't twist my words please. I've indicated that I assumed the list >> was about bikeshedding about the tool, and never considered it to be >> a decision making list. I still find the name of the list confusing. > > So, because you find the name of the list confusing you are now > bikeshedding about its name? And you cannot accept that the list has > made a decision without consulting you because you made wrong > assumptions about this very list without even bothering to check your > assumptions? I find it hard to believe that you are serious. Surely, you
> must be kidding. I refuse to accept that if someone twists my words I should not correct that. If that's called bikeshedding, I will be the biggest fan of bikeshedding from now on. I gave my personal understanding of what the list was supposed to be, I made a wrong assumption when the list was created, and I indicated this could be the case for more people. I know the real purpose of this list for quite some time already. We ran into some questions while preparing the systems and we felt that another decision (if you think one was already made, which some people doubt) could lead to a better setup. We gave an advise, and I personally hope we can all stop attacking the messengers and the timing and look at the document and discuss the problems it addresses. Best, -- Tom Albers KDE Sysadmin _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
