On September 8, 2010 13:32:19 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Wednesday 08 September 2010, Chani wrote: > > On September 8, 2010 03:21:38 [email protected] wrote: > > > On Tuesday 7. September 2010 18.04.40 Tom Albers wrote: > > now I'm gonna play devil^Wsysadmin's advocate for a minute here ;) > > > > > Ignored disadvantages; > > > * having each app in koffice as a repo and doing a refactor means > > > you need to push to multiple repositories. Managing multiple > > > repositories is not something that git is good at and as a result > > > you will have to do multiple pushes yourself. This has a real-life > > > effect on daily operations. > > > > still, doing a refactor isn't a regular thing (one would hope) so I'd > > count this as a minor annoyance. > > For larger applications (like Kontact/KMail and probably also for > KOffice) quite the contrary is true. When working on larger applications > you will do a lot of refactoring whenever you add a new larger feature > because otherwise the application will quickly become an unmaintainable > mess.
ah. good to know. > > Whether multiple separate pushes are a minor or major annoyance I cannot > judge. well, as someone who'll always be doing separate pushes to kdelibs and kdebase, I consider them minor :) _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
