On Sunday 05 December 2010 10:30:51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter > > history. > > i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is already > in a separate repo, so unless one'd want to be able to check out > historically accurate revisions of kdelibs (which is a pipe dream > anyway), there is no reason to duplicate it.
Wouldn't just removing those dirs from the kdelibs repos make those old revision fail to compile? Wouldn't we have to adjust CMakeLists.txt files accordingly? If yes, do we care? Mike _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
