On Sunday 05 December 2010 10.30.51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter > > history. > > i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is already > in a separate repo, so unless one'd want to be able to check out > historically accurate revisions of kdelibs (which is a pipe dream > anyway), there is no reason to duplicate it.
Well this will transform the history so that kate never have been in kdelibs and that would be to lie, or atleast I think so, hence the delete kate before or after but not during. I'm of the oppiniion that we should use the conversion to fix issues but hide/rewrite the past. /Regards Torgny _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
