A Dimecres, 29 de desembre de 2010, Riccardo Iaconelli va escriure: > On Monday 27 December 2010 23:48:17 Marcel Wiesweg wrote: > > Well, we went for a non-split repo with digikam et al and the answer from > > sysadmins was pretty clear (monolithic a no-go). > > I'm sorry to intrude in this discussion, but did you get this message from > the paper that sysadmins wrote or from other discussions? (private or on > the mailinglists...) > > Because AFAIK the decision was to let every module to decide what's best > for them, and I think that, precisely for the reasons that Albert states, > you should be encouraged to keep a big repositories with all the > application that need/want to be in there. Other repositories are doing > that too! And there is always the possibility to split, later, if there > are some problems.
The problem is that they want kdegraphics/libs to be inside the "digikam" repo. That's what is a no go. Albert _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
