> The initial idea from the Digikam people was to have 1 repository with: > - digikam > - kipi-plugins > - libkface > - libkdcraw > - libkexiv2 > in the very same repository. > > That's what we have indicated that was a bad idea. > > That's different than the discussion we have had on this list before about > splitting or not. In this case it would be combining all kinds of libs > into one repo.
Tom as you know, I fully agree now to have split repos for digikam. The point discussed in this thread here was to have 1 repository with: - okular - gwenview - kolourpaint - kruler - ksnapshot - strigi-analyzer - libksane - libkdcraw - libkexiv2 - libkipi in the very same repository. which looks like a pretty similar idea to me. Summarizing what I learnt so far: - there are advantages to have small, agile repositories - there are means on a different technical level than "git repository" to group applications and libs to a module - splitting a project in git repositories is not a social, but a merely technical measure leads me to the conclusion that kdegraphics should end up in split repos as well, maybe also with a shallow superproject repo, at least temporarily. Marcel _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
