On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 03:48, Will Stephenson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 04 February 2011 09:52:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> A Divendres, 4 de febrer de 2011, Will Stephenson va escriure: >> > I notice that the remote branches for kdepimlibs and plasma-addons do not >> > have the "KDE/" prefix for the "official" 4.x branches. Is this a known >> > issue? >> >> Actually it's the other way around, the KDE/ prefixes shouldn't be there >> for the rest, at least imo :D > > So it's just a matter of opinion? I like the KDE way then, it identifies the > project release tags from any other numbered tags.
Hey Will, I actually started a thread called " next steps with Git migration" on k-c-d. I suggested removing the 'KDE/' prefix, this got a thumbs up from togge, and then the thread died. Maybe you could stir things up a bit and we can find some sort of decision. The i18n team has requested that all KDE modules have the same name for version branches and I think we can all agree that it makes sense. Your logic is why I thought the KDE prefix makes sense. But the first thing that happened after the repos were put up was that errant '4.6' branches were created by people making mistakes when pushing. So I dunno. Ian _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
