On 2/4/2011 3:23 PM, Ian Monroe wrote: > Maybe you could stir things up a bit and we can find some sort of > decision. The i18n team has requested that all KDE modules have the > same name for version branches and I think we can all agree that it > makes sense.
There's another reason to strive for consistency: Tools like kdesrc-build allow to specify a branch globally for all modules; different naming conventions per module make this more work. > Your logic is why I thought the KDE prefix makes sense. But the first > thing that happened after the repos were put up was that errant '4.6' > branches were created by people making mistakes when pushing. So I > dunno. Personally I'd go without the prefix just because it matches up better with our usual parlance of talking about "the 4.6 branch" etc. > Ian -- Best regards, Eike Hein _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
