Can we continue this discussion off-bugzilla and onto our mailing list. It's quite interesting, but not really related to that bug-report.
CC-ing the KDE-Telepathy (where this started), and KDE-Quality mailing list (where this discussion should be) Backstory for those new: - there was a comment "is this bug closed" on a bug that was marked as resolved. In KTp we're currently treating those two states as the same thing. >Well, I meant CLOSED as opposed to RESOLVED. I guess you are not using CLOSED (yet?) either. As I understand it in bugzilla terms, resolved is the development team saying it's fixed. Closed is used when a QA team has accepted the patch. Is this correct? Given manpower/resources, I was under the (wrong?) impression that in KDE we simply go to resolved and closed was in reality unused/pointless. Certainly with my developer hat on, it seems it. 1) How _should_ we be using "closed" as opposed to "resolved" in an ideal world? 2) Which KDE teams do use it? The only way I can see this being useful is if every time we made a release we bulk changed anything resolved to fixed where FIXED-IN matched the current version number. But only sysadmins/a few people can make bulk changes like that. _______________________________________________ Kde-testing mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-testing
