On 21.08.09 14:20:12, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > On Friday 21 August 2009, Jaroslaw S wrote: > > Perhaps moving to KDE SVN would be a first step into having the app > > packaged? > > I know KDE is very inclusive about that. But not every project *wants* to be > included in KDE svn, nor would this make much sense in some cases. To mention > just *some* reasons, I like the flexibility of truely being the admin of my > project, including the ability to hand out SVN write privileges myself, the > (relative, but real) comfort of managing all project ressources through a > single platform,
Those are valid reasons. > the freedom to set release cycles that are often much > shorter, and sometimes much longer than KDE's... This is not. There are tons of apps in KDE svn that have their own release cycle: amarok, k3b, koffice just to name a few prominent ones. Andreas -- Never commit yourself! Let someone else commit you. _______________________________________________ Kde-windows mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
