On Friday 21 August 2009, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > the freedom to set release cycles that are often much > > shorter, and sometimes much longer than KDE's... > > This is not. There are tons of apps in KDE svn that have their own release > cycle: amarok, k3b, koffice just to name a few prominent ones.
Ok, true. But if the suggestion was to move that moving to KDE svn would have the benefit of more or less "automagic" package creation, then - all other issues aside - I don't see that happening on my own release schedule. Anyway, my point was that I don't want to move rkward to KDE svn. And unless you expect and want *every* third party KDE based project to move into KDE svn, the KDE windows installer could be made more friendly to third parties (see the original mail). Regards Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-windows mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-windows
