I don't know if it's a good way, and why 2.0 and not 1.0 ?? In my way, I think a lot of users use kdenlive 0.5 and 0.6 cause they use old distribution (hardy, feisty ...).
Certainly, they want to keep their version of distrib. And actually, it don't exist a complete package it install all dependancies of kdenlive 0.7.1 . For example, i had Ubuntu Studio Hardy to do MAO, but i love Kdenlive too. But i never can install this new version with this distrib... 2009/1/26 Jean-Michel Pour? <jm at poure.com> > A lot of users are complaining that Kdenlive 0.5 or 0.6 is not working. > They don't understand that Kdenlive 0.7 is a complete rewrite. Should we > rename Kdenlive 0.7.2 to Kdenlive 2.0? What do you think? > > Kind regards, > Jean-Michel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20090126/70b63639/attachment.html>
