Jean-Michel Pour? wrote: > A lot of users are complaining that Kdenlive 0.5 or 0.6 is not working. > They don't understand that Kdenlive 0.7 is a complete rewrite. Should we > rename Kdenlive 0.7.2 to Kdenlive 2.0? What do you think? > > Kind regards, > Jean-Michel >
I'm a brand new member of this list. With DD leaving kino, I decided to follow him here, which required a lot of one day to build the various dependencies for kdenlive on Fedora 10. I'd be happy to share the very crude rpm spec files I used to get it all going. That's all prologue for the suggestion you wait until there's a clear route through the dependencies for at least one major distro. Then I'd blow a horn, announce Version 1.0, and have a party. sean
