Many thanks to those who responded to help me with this.  Initially, I resolved 
this by modifying a user-supplied patch to remove this option from sent packets.


Today, I found the "proper" solution in the 1.2.0 documentation.  This is 
tested and working.


8.2.17. Echoing Client-ID (RFC 6842)

The original DHCPv4 specification (RFC 
2131<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2131>) states that the DHCPv4 server must 
not send back client-id options when responding to clients. However, in some 
cases that confused clients that did not have MAC address or client-id; see RFC 
6842<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6842>. for details. That behavior has 
changed with the publication of RFC 6842<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6842> 
which updated RFC 2131<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2131>. That update states 
that the server must send client-id if the client sent it. That is Kea's 
default behavior. However, in some cases older devices that do not support RFC 
6842<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6842>. may refuse to accept responses that 
include the client-id option. To enable backward compatibility, an optional 
configuration parameter has been introduced. To configure it, use the following 
configuration statement:

"Dhcp4": {
    "echo-client-id": false,
    ...
}




Duane Wylie



________________________________
From: Kea-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Duane Wylie 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 3:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Kea-users] Client-ID (option 61)


We're evaluating KEA (version 1.2.0) as our DHCP platform moving forward.  In 
my testing with our Docsis/HFC network, I am not able to have a docsis modem 
respond to a DHCPOFFER message from KEA.  I can get the same modem to respond 
to a similarly formatted DHCPOFFER from ISC DHCP.


Looking at the tcpdump output from the server, the only difference that stands 
out is the Client-ID (option 61).  While, in both cases, the docsis modem does 
supply the Client-ID in the DHCPDISCOVER packet, the KEA server DOES include 
the Client-ID in the resulting DHCPOFFER where the ISC DHCP server DOES NOT 
include the Client-ID in it's DHCPOFFER.


(Interesting note: RFC 2131 (Draft Standard) states that the server "MUST NOT" 
include the Client-ID in the DHCPOFFER.  At the same time, RFC 6842 (Proposed 
Standard) indicates the server MUST include the Client-ID IF the client 
provided it in the DHCPDISCOVER.)


I need to determine why the KEA offer is not 'working'.  Admittedly, I do not 
know for certain that the Client-ID is the root of my problem.  I think the 
next step is to somehow prove that success or failure does indeed hinge on the 
inclusion of the Client-ID field in the DHCPOFFER.  I'm at somewhat of an 
impasse, as I cannot figure out how to tell KEA to NOT include the option.  (At 
the same time, I cannot figure out how to tell ISC DHCP to include the option - 
though this is off topic for the Kea-users list.)


Does anyone have any insight into a configuration option to disable option 61?  
Is there a generic way to disable a certain option via the kea.conf file?  Or, 
where in the code can I 'flip the switch' the turn option 61 off on an offer?



Thanks in advance,

Duane

_______________________________________________
Kea-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users

Reply via email to