On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:06, Norman Clarke <nor...@njclarke.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:47, steve donovan <steve.j.dono...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> LuaDoc helpfully strips line feeds from the contents of comments, >> assuming that its literal HTML and linefeeds are not going to matter. >> >> However, this is a problem if you do wish to put a <pre> section in >> your module header, or if you wanted to process comments using >> Markdown automatically. Modern users are increasingly keen on >> documentation that goes beyond simple per-function annotation, and it >> would be nice to be able to make them happy. >> >> Would patches along these lines be accepted? Is there any particular >> reason for stripping linefeeds? > > Coincidentally, I'm actually already working on this and some other > improvements/enhancements here: > > https://github.com/keplerproject/luadoc/tree/formatting
FYI: I recently (a month or two ago) submitted a patch with some fixes and enhancements to Tomás but I guess he hasn't had the time to integrate it in a new release. If you're interested just let me know, although I won't be able to send you the patch until I'm back at work, which will be after New Year. -- Dirk _______________________________________________ Kepler-Project mailing list Kepler-Project@lists.luaforge.net http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kepler-project http://www.keplerproject.org/
