On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 19:17, Dirk Feytons <dirk.feyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:06, Norman Clarke <nor...@njclarke.com> wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:47, steve donovan <steve.j.dono...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> LuaDoc helpfully strips line feeds from the contents of comments, >>> assuming that its literal HTML and linefeeds are not going to matter. >>> >>> However, this is a problem if you do wish to put a <pre> section in >>> your module header, or if you wanted to process comments using >>> Markdown automatically. Modern users are increasingly keen on >>> documentation that goes beyond simple per-function annotation, and it >>> would be nice to be able to make them happy. >>> >>> Would patches along these lines be accepted? Is there any particular >>> reason for stripping linefeeds? >> >> Coincidentally, I'm actually already working on this and some other >> improvements/enhancements here: >> >> https://github.com/keplerproject/luadoc/tree/formatting > > FYI: I recently (a month or two ago) submitted a patch with some fixes > and enhancements to Tomás but I guess he hasn't had the time to > integrate it in a new release. If you're interested just let me know, > although I won't be able to send you the patch until I'm back at work, > which will be after New Year.
I'm not the maintainer but am actively working on the items mentioned here and some other small tweaks to Luadoc, so I'd be happy to take a look at your patches if you want to send them when you get back to work. I will also be mostly on vacation until Jan 6th, so no rush. Best regards, Norman _______________________________________________ Kepler-Project mailing list Kepler-Project@lists.luaforge.net http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kepler-project http://www.keplerproject.org/
