On 11/09/09 08:41, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote: > 2009/11/9 Peter Shoults <Peter.Shoults at sun.com>: > >> On 11/08/09 22:15, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote: >> >>> is this bug not closed? >>> >>> check >>> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/diff/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/gss_mechs/mech_krb5/krb5/os/kuserok.c?r1=%252Fonnv%252Fonnv-gate%252Fusr%252Fsrc%252Flib%252Fgss_mechs%252Fmech_krb5%252Fkrb5%252Fos%252Fkuserok.c%400%3A68f95e015346&r2=%252Fonnv%252Fonnv-gate%252Fusr%252Fsrc%252Flib%252Fgss_mechs%252Fmech_krb5%252Fkrb5%252Fos%252Fkuserok.c%40781%3A57319a72b15f&format=u&full=0 >>> >>> nacho >>> _______________________________________________ >>> kerberos-discuss mailing list >>> kerberos-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/kerberos-discuss >>> >>> >> Hi, >> >> This issue was taken care of by a resync of the Solaris kerberos code to >> 1.4 of the MIT kerberos code. This was done a long time ago, so should >> be present in OpenSolaris's version of Kerberos. >> >> Do you have an issue with username length? Or some other issue? >> >> Peter >> >> > no, I was merely pointing out that the bug is in 4-Defer state in > bugster and it should be closed marked as fixed. > > nacho > Hi,
It was determined that while the 10 char restriction has been increased to 64 chars, it still poses an arbitrary restriction, so it was determined that we should still keep this open in deferred state if at some point we need to be even more flexible with regard to size of username length. Pete -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/kerberos-discuss/attachments/20091109/b7417d53/attachment-0001.html>
