makes sense, would you mind updating the bug then?
2009/11/9 Peter Shoults <Peter.Shoults at sun.com>: > On 11/09/09 08:41, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote: > > 2009/11/9 Peter Shoults <Peter.Shoults at sun.com>: > > > On 11/08/09 22:15, Ignacio Marambio Cat?n wrote: > > > is this bug not closed? > > check > http://src.opensolaris.org/source/diff/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/gss_mechs/mech_krb5/krb5/os/kuserok.c?r1=%252Fonnv%252Fonnv-gate%252Fusr%252Fsrc%252Flib%252Fgss_mechs%252Fmech_krb5%252Fkrb5%252Fos%252Fkuserok.c%400%3A68f95e015346&r2=%252Fonnv%252Fonnv-gate%252Fusr%252Fsrc%252Flib%252Fgss_mechs%252Fmech_krb5%252Fkrb5%252Fos%252Fkuserok.c%40781%3A57319a72b15f&format=u&full=0 > > nacho > _______________________________________________ > kerberos-discuss mailing list > kerberos-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/kerberos-discuss > > > > Hi, > > This issue was taken care of by a resync of the Solaris kerberos code to > 1.4 of the MIT kerberos code. ?This was done a long time ago, so should > be present in OpenSolaris's version of Kerberos. > > Do you have an issue with username length? ?Or some other issue? > > Peter > > > > no, I was merely pointing out that the bug is in 4-Defer state in > bugster and it should be closed marked as fixed. > > nacho > > > Hi, > > It was determined that while the 10 char restriction has been increased to > 64 chars, it still poses an arbitrary restriction, so it was determined that > we should still keep this open in deferred state if at some point we need to > be even more flexible with regard to size of username length. > > Pete >
