I know the text of RFC 2946 very well. I am one of the authors. My point is where did you get the value 129, and who authorized you to use it?
These are internet standards using shared address spaces. You can't just choose numbers out of a hat. I have already had to deal with collisions in the name space because people randomly decided to use arbitrary values without registering them with the appropriate organizations. I would be interested in seeing a write-up of your USE_GSS_ENCRYPTION. I wonder how you are using GSSAPI for ENCRYPTION without using it for authentication. In article <9v2rfb$rbk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Salil Dangi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > Just wondering: : > . where did you get the Telnet Encryption Option ENCTYPE number from? : > Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer C-Kermit 8.0 Beta available : : RFC 2946 defines available Encryption types. : We have implemented a variant and called it USS_GSS_ENCRYPTION : and currently using a value of 129. : : Salil : : RFC 2946 : ENCRYPT 38 : Encryption Commands : IS 0 : SUPPORT 1 : REPLY 2 : START 3 : END 4 : REQUEST-START 5 : REQUEST-END 6 : ENC_KEYID 7 : DEC_KEYID 8 : Encryption Types : NULL 0 : DES_CFB64 1 : DES_OFB64 2 : DES3_CFB64 3 : DES3_OFB64 4 : CAST5_40_CFB64 8 : CAST5_40_OFB64 9 : CAST128_CFB64 10 : CAST128_OFB64 11 : : : Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer C-Kermit 8.0 Beta available The Kermit Project @ Columbia University includes Secure Telnet and FTP http://www.kermit-project.org/ using Kerberos, SRP, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenSSL. SSH soon to follow.
