Re: Telnet Encryption Options vs. Kerberos V5

[those who know me have no need of my name]

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged:
>"Salil Dangi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> We are treating this field to be an unsigned integer of one byte. With this
>> assumption, the value is 129 and not negative 1.
>
>Nit pick: 129 or 0x81 would actually be -127.  255 or 0xff would be -1.

given certain, other, assumptions.

-- 
okay, have a sig then