On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 08:12:20PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote: > and thanks everyone for setting straight re: the idea of ticket ACL's. > :)
Actually, I think that it would be a good thing if there were an authorization data type for packing ticket ACLs (i.e., princ name patterns) into forwarded TGTs. The idea being that you could forward a TGT that is crippled and allows the receiver of it to get tickets in your name to only a few services. But I'm not really pushing that, yet. And I see no reason why one could not limit, at the KDC/KDB, what service tickets a given principal can get. It's not a substitute for proper authorization code in the actual services though, as has been pointed out. > --paulj Cheers, Nico -- -DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting- -to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute- -and copy this message.- Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
