Wyllys,
I saw your response to the bug report suggesting adding KfW support
to Mozilla for Windows.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280792

I think this would be a great idea, and people in the Kerberos community
would agree as well, and express their comments as well.

There are many windows machines that are not in a domain, or are on
travel and can not access the AD or are part of a Kerberos realm at
all yet the user would like to use Kerberos to access a web services.
These might even be now Windows servers that support SPNEGO line Apache.

Please reconsider your coments.






Several applications like Vandyke Secure CRT allow the user to choose on Windows
when they use gss-api Kerberos authentication whether they use the Windows SSPI
or MIT Kerberos at runtime through configuration.  I'm interested in Mozilla
supporting this option as well. Would a sufficient number of people find this
useful to include it? We should of course keep the default to SSPI for Windows
platforms which support it.


------- Additional Comment #1 From Wyllys Ingersoll 2005-02-02 08:33 PST [reply] -------

In order to support this, the host would have to already have the MIT
Kerberos-For-Windows packages already installed.

Not really, the program checks for the existance of the dll.


I think there is a very tiny percentage of sites that would find this useful. I don't really know if this could be a run-time option, it would most likely have to be compiled at build time which makes it even less attractive.

I really don't see what the functional benefit would be.  SSPI is integrated in
Windows and is wire-compatible with GSSAPI applications.  Where is the benefit
to the end user of having mozilla use GSSAPI on Windows instead of SSPI?








--

 Douglas E. Engert  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Argonne National Laboratory
 9700 South Cass Avenue
 Argonne, Illinois  60439
 (630) 252-5444
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list           [email protected]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos

Reply via email to