Douglas, I would be interested to discuss with somebody the possibility of Mozilla being able to use the CyberSafe GSS-API library on Windows as well as the MIT GSS, and perhaps (for completeness) the Hiemdal GSS library as well... From our perspective I can see a need for this functionality - as you mentioned, sometimes the workstation does not have access to AD, or is part of a non-Microsoft Kerberos realm etc.
Regards, Tim. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas E. Engert Sent: 02 February 2005 17:46 To: Wyllys Ingersoll; '[email protected]' Subject: Kerberos for windows support in Mozilla Wyllys, I saw your response to the bug report suggesting adding KfW support to Mozilla for Windows. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280792 I think this would be a great idea, and people in the Kerberos community would agree as well, and express their comments as well. There are many windows machines that are not in a domain, or are on travel and can not access the AD or are part of a Kerberos realm at all yet the user would like to use Kerberos to access a web services. These might even be now Windows servers that support SPNEGO line Apache. Please reconsider your coments. > > > Several applications like Vandyke Secure CRT allow the user to choose > on Windows when they use gss-api Kerberos authentication whether they > use the Windows SSPI or MIT Kerberos at runtime through configuration. > I'm interested in Mozilla supporting this option as well. Would a > sufficient number of people find this useful to include it? We should > of course keep the default to SSPI for Windows platforms which support it. > > > ------- Additional Comment #1 From Wyllys Ingersoll 2005-02-02 08:33 > PST [reply] ------- > > In order to support this, the host would have to already have the MIT > Kerberos-For-Windows packages already installed. Not really, the program checks for the existance of the dll. > > I think there is a very tiny percentage of sites that would find this useful. > I don't really know if this could be a run-time option, it would most > likely have to be compiled at build time which makes it even less attractive. > > I really don't see what the functional benefit would be. SSPI is > integrated in Windows and is wire-compatible with GSSAPI applications. > Where is the benefit to the end user of having mozilla use GSSAPI on Windows instead of SSPI? > > -- Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439 (630) 252-5444 ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
