Hi, Wrt. the problem of having "@" in principal names and some client software not accepting "local-part\@domain@REALM".
Am I correct when I conclude the "name types" (RFC4120 section 6.2) is not widely supported either? It seems NT-SMTP-NAME is excatly what I need. /Peter ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
