On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 09:11 -0500, Peter Mogensen wrote: > Am I correct when I conclude the "name types" (RFC4120 section 6.2) is > not widely supported either?
That's essentially correct. There's no string form representation of different name types, so the name type of a principal tends to be limited to a few values (NT-UNKNOWN, NT-SRV-INST, or NT-SRV-HST) depending on application context. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
