steve <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 18:51 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It's also sort of weird and complex, and people struggle to understand it. >> I'm therefore considering changing the next release to always acquire >> fresh tickets each time k5start wakes up. So if you run k5start -K 10, >> then k5start will wake up every ten minutes and acquire new tickets >> unconditionally, regardless of whether the current tickets are about to >> expire. > Hi > From: The Campaign To Save -K (European branch) > Please remember that you're not always dealing with admins with mit > education;) Here, we're just simple folk who have to keep a domain > alive. Every day. We are scared to death of Kerberos. -K works an > absolute treat. We understand it. Could you please retain it? If you > must make a change then could it be an addition? We'd suggest -J. If you > already have -J then just choose another letter. Easy. I'm fairly sure that you won't notice any difference at all except that it will be easier to understand. I think this change will actually make -K *better* for people who don't care about what's going on under the hood and just need an active ticket cache. If I'm missing something, though, please do let me know. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
