steve <[email protected]> writes: > Only the human aspect of it. If you are saying that our -K now will work > the same as your new -K then perfect. But you aren't. You can only give > us 'fairly sure'. My boss doesn't do 'fairly sure'. Please don't fix > something that isn't broken. If you really must do soething to k5start, > leave -K as it is and do -someOtherLetter as an additional switch.
I believe the only difference from the perspective of an existing user is that k5start will do more Kerberos authentications. It would surprise me a great deal if you would even notice, since Kerberos authentications are exceptionally light-weight. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
