Andrew Cobaugh <> writes:

> Also currently using it to demonstrate how much faster MIT Kerberos is
> compared to AD, even when not using workers (on modern-ish CPUs, without
> workers enabled krb5kdc can do ~4000 rps. I can share more details if
> folks are interested).

Ah, good, I'm glad my 100 qps number was off in the direction that I
thought it would be.  I didn't want to overpromise, but KDCs are *really

Russ Allbery (              <>
Kerberos mailing list 

Reply via email to