Thank you so much for confirming that the KDCs are fast. This saved me a ton of time writing my own tests, etc. Andrew, as far as workers, is it one worker per core in general as Russ theorized?
Otherwise, I think I’m all set for now. Thanks!! > On Apr 16, 2018, at 8:41 PM, Russ Allbery <ea...@eyrie.org> wrote: > > Andrew Cobaugh <andrew.coba...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Also currently using it to demonstrate how much faster MIT Kerberos is >> compared to AD, even when not using workers (on modern-ish CPUs, without >> workers enabled krb5kdc can do ~4000 rps. I can share more details if >> folks are interested). > > Ah, good, I'm glad my 100 qps number was off in the direction that I > thought it would be. I didn't want to overpromise, but KDCs are *really > fast*. > > -- > Russ Allbery (ea...@eyrie.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> > ________________________________________________ > Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
