On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Le 04/07/15 07:49, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
> > On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Zheng, Kai <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Kiran.
> >>
> >>>> you need latest mavibot build in your local repo
> >> Do we have to rely on this? Maybe we could use some public version? If
> not
> >> then when could we have the new release version?
> >> I do have the local build of Mavibot, but am not sure all Kerby
> developers
> >> do.
> >>
> > It is available in the repository
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots
> >
> > Those who do not want to build it locally can use this configuration
> > http://apaste.info/qLE to set their
> > maven setting.xml (either create new file or update existing accordingly)
>
> That's not a good idea, IMO.
>
> both are in development, so I don't see any issue with it

> We should never depend on a SNAPSHOT. I'd rather cut a release of
> MAVIBOT and make Kerby depend on this release, but in the mean time, I
> strongly suggest the module not to be added (or to be commented) in the
> kerby build.
>
if a release version of Kerby depends on a snapshot then agree, but that is
not the case here



-- 
Kiran Ayyagari
http://keydap.com

Reply via email to