Thanks Jiajia and Emmanuel for the thoughts. >> Depends. It's fine for a module to contain only 2 sub-modules. If you look >> at kerby-tool, this is the same story. Yes, the count doesn't justify the change. My bad.
>> Why would you like to move kerby-config and kerby-util one level ? (btw, I >> think 'lib' is an atrocious name). Initially Kiran used to propose positioning the two modules as top level modules, but I was afraid the global top level modules are too many, which doesn't happen in fact. It looks more natural to see the two modules as top level not only because of their functions in future, but also because we hardly have a good container name better than 'lib'. Sound good? Regards, Kai -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Move kerby-config and kerby-util modules out of lib to the top Le 16/07/15 15:49, Li, Jiajia a écrit : > I think it's fine. > > Thanks > Jiajia > > -----Original Message----- > From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 8:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Move kerby-config and kerby-util modules out of lib to the > top > > Hi all, > > The lib folder only contains two sub modules, kerby-config and kerby-util, > which looks a little weird. I'm going to move them to the top, any concern? > Thanks. Depends. It's fine for a module to contain only 2 sub-modules. If you look at kerby-tool, this is the same story. Why would you like to move kerby-config and kerby-util one level ? (btw, I think 'lib' is an atrocious name).
