Le 16/07/15 17:04, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > >>> Why would you like to move kerby-config and kerby-util one level ? (btw, I >>> think 'lib' is an atrocious name). > Initially Kiran used to propose positioning the two modules as top level > modules, but I was afraid the global top level modules are too many, which > doesn't happen in fact. It looks more natural to see the two modules as top > level not only because of their functions in future, but also because we > hardly have a good container name better than 'lib'. Sound good?
Sounds good to me. I don't like 'lib', it does not convey any information about what's in, and config and utils deserves to be put at top level.
