Thanks for the pointers to the PKINIT branch. I'll start taking a look. Looking forward to 1.0. Tom
On 7/30/15, 1:32 AM, "Li, Jiajia" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Tom, >The branch >pkinit-support(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github >.com_apache_directory-2Dkerby_commits_pkinit-2Dsupport&d=BQIFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6 >M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=FMI-8tHQKm6tnXCSnZar1a8rVOb_uN7qjvrZ >SRPdoRM&m=IzyxUcY6tvkg76yryVxDsa2snhMmGO7Ep21P83z40qU&s=lHzDjEAeXlgIJLk6bd >EJwaBCJk6JGJftIneK55eLehM&e= ) has been merge from master, >but still exists some check style issue, we will fix after the first >release. >So if you want to build the project , you can skipped with -Pnochecks, >such as "mvn package -Pnochecks ". >Thanks for your interesting and welcome to join Kerby. > >Thanks >Jiajia > >-----Original Message----- >From: Zheng, Kai [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 6:06 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: Kerby interest > >Hi Tom, > >Nice interest!! I'm very happy your team could join the effort and this >makes great sense to the young project. > >For the 1st release, the community had some discussion and we're >expecting to get it done as soon as possible. For that we have got many >essential things done, I thought we'd have another summary status report >for the progress, and we'll need to see what's the gap for the release. >Emmanuel or Kiran, what's your idea? > >For PKINIT, 50% is my rough estimation (maybe bad). For the release, I >had moved the codes out of the trunk to a branch. We need a sync for the >branch to move on as there is quite much change in the trunk recently. >PKINIT is next major feature we'll make it work after the release, but >sure we can resume the effort earlier, in separate branch in parallel, as >we do in other ASF projects. Maybe we could roughly break the goal down >into pieces: 1) PKINT in client side; 2) PKINT in KDC side; 3) PKINIT >anonymous. Our old plan is to get 1) work first talking to MIT KDC. To >move on, we'll make the PKINIT branch much prepared and let's discuss it >in details maybe in relevant JIRAs. Note we're using this master JIRA for >the new project: >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jir >a_browse_DIRKRB-2D102&d=BQIFAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-u >Es&r=FMI-8tHQKm6tnXCSnZar1a8rVOb_uN7qjvrZSRPdoRM&m=IzyxUcY6tvkg76yryVxDsa2 >snhMmGO7Ep21P83z40qU&s=wqa09ew6yVloOquZtw7PpSVd707xaUn1uN_v3kzJmSQ&e= > >Regards, >Kai > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tom Mueller [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 4:53 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Kerby interest > >Greetings, > >Kerby is new to me but I'm quite excited about what it has to offer. The >project goals look great as an embeddable Java Kerberos implementation is >really needed. Having read through the material on the website, >downloaded and built the code, and experimented with it to some extent, >our team is ready to take the next step with Kerby. > >I saw the "Kerby Status Summary" that was posted on July 3, but I didn't >find anything there about plans to publish the maven modules to maven >central or some other publicly available maven repository. Is there a >projected date for that? > >We have interest in the PKINIT implementation that was reported as about >50% completed as of July 3. How can I get involved with helping to >complete that implementation? > >Thank you. >Tom Mueller >VMware, Inc.
